Intel Atom Z3795 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9550
Comparative analysis of Intel Atom Z3795 and Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Security & Reliability. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Atom Z3795
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 45 nm
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1196 vs 989
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 743 vs 645
- 10.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.904 vs 0.282
- Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.144 vs 0.081
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 45 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1196 vs 989 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 743 vs 645 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.904 vs 0.282 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.144 vs 0.081 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T9550
- Around 11% higher clock speed: 2.66 GHz vs 2.39 GHz
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1072 vs 642
- Around 74% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 378 vs 217
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 21.914 vs 8.148
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.038 vs 1.692
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.66 GHz vs 2.39 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1072 vs 642 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 378 vs 217 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 21.914 vs 8.148 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.038 vs 1.692 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Atom Z3795
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T9550
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Atom Z3795 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 642 | 1072 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1196 | 989 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 217 | 378 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 743 | 645 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.904 | 0.282 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 8.148 | 21.914 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.144 | 0.081 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.692 | 2.038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 875 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 875 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.515 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Atom Z3795 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Bay Trail | Penryn |
| Launch date | Q1'14 | 1 January 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 3147 | 3139 |
| Processor Number | Z3795 | T9550 |
| Series | Intel® Atom™ Processor Z Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $316 | |
| Price now | $298.95 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.78 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.59 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2.39 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | |
| L2 cache | 6144 KB | |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C | |
| Transistor count | 410 million | |
| VID voltage range | 1.050V-1.212V | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 17.1 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB | |
| Supported memory types | LPDDR3 1066 | |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 311 MHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 778 MHz | |
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 17mm x 17mm | 35mm x 35mm |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 2 W | |
| Sockets supported | UTFCBGA1380 | BGA479, PGA478 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Atom Z3795 with others
IntelAtom Z3795 vs
IntelCore i5-430M
IntelAtom Z3795 vs
IntelAtom E3826
IntelAtom Z3795 vs
IntelCeleron N2930
