Intel Atom Z670 vs Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700
Comparative analysis of Intel Atom Z670 and Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Atom Z670
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- 11.7x lower typical power consumption: 3 Watt vs 35 Watt
| Launch date | April 2011 vs 7 December 2008 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 3 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
- Around 22% higher clock speed: 1.83 GHz vs 1.5 GHz
- Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 90
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 6.7x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1058 vs 158
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
| Maximum frequency | 1.83 GHz vs 1.5 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 90 |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB vs 512 KB (per core) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1058 vs 158 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Atom Z670
CPU 2: Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Atom Z670 | Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 95 | 0 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 158 | 1058 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Atom Z670 | Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Lincroft | Merom |
| Launch date | April 2011 | 7 December 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 3324 | 3332 |
| Processor Number | Z670 | T1700 |
| Series | Legacy Intel Atom® Processors | Legacy Intel® Celeron® Processor |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 1.50 GHz | 1.83 GHz |
| Die size | 65 mm | 143 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1024 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 1.5 GHz | 1.83 GHz |
| Number of cores | 1 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 140 million | 291 million |
| VID voltage range | 1.1125-1.5000V | 1.075V-1.175V |
| 64 bit support | ||
| Bus Speed | 667 MHz FSB | |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 667 MHz | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 1 | |
| Maximum memory size | 2.93 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR2 800 | |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 400 MHz | |
| Processor graphics | Integrated | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| LVDS | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 13.8mmx13.8mm | 35mm x 35mm |
| Sockets supported | T-PBGA518 | PPGA478 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 3 Watt | 35 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI support | ||
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||