Intel Core 2 Duo L7200 vs Intel Atom Z670
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo L7200 and Intel Atom Z670 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo L7200
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
- Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 90
- 4.3x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 684 vs 158
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 90 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 684 vs 158 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Atom Z670
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- 5.7x lower typical power consumption: 3 Watt vs 17 Watt
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 3 Watt vs 17 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo L7200
CPU 2: Intel Atom Z670
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Duo L7200 | Intel Atom Z670 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 0 | 95 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 684 | 158 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core 2 Duo L7200 | Intel Atom Z670 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Merom | Lincroft |
| Launch date | Q1'07 | April 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 3333 | 3324 |
| Processor Number | L7200 | Z670 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel Atom® Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.33 GHz | 1.50 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 667 MHz FSB | |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 65 mm |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 90 |
| Number of cores | 2 | 1 |
| Transistor count | 291 million | 140 million |
| VID voltage range | 0.9V-1.1V | 1.1125-1.5000V |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | |
| Maximum frequency | 1.5 GHz | |
| Number of threads | 2 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | 13.8mmx13.8mm |
| Sockets supported | PBGA479 | T-PBGA518 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt | 3 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | |
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 1 | |
| Maximum memory size | 2.93 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR2 800 | |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 400 MHz | |
| Processor graphics | Integrated | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| LVDS | ||
Peripherals |
||
| PCI support | ||