Intel Celeron 1005M vs Intel Pentium 2020M
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron 1005M and Intel Pentium 2020M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 1005M
- CPU is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher maximum core temperature: 105 °C vs 90 °C
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.937 vs 2.116
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 July 2013 vs 1 October 2012 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C vs 90 °C |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.937 vs 2.116 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium 2020M
- Around 26% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 1.9 GHz
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1274 vs 1017
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1396 vs 1113
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 426 vs 339
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 796 vs 633
- 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 70.755 vs 16.453
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.372 vs 0.149
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 3.787 vs 3.522
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.032 vs 1.277
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2189 vs 1949
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2189 vs 1949
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz vs 1.9 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1274 vs 1017 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1396 vs 1113 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 426 vs 339 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 796 vs 633 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 70.755 vs 16.453 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.372 vs 0.149 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.787 vs 3.522 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.032 vs 1.277 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2189 vs 1949 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2189 vs 1949 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron 1005M
CPU 2: Intel Pentium 2020M
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron 1005M | Intel Pentium 2020M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1017 | 1274 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1113 | 1396 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 339 | 426 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 633 | 796 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.937 | 2.116 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.453 | 70.755 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.149 | 0.372 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.522 | 3.787 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.277 | 4.032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1949 | 2189 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1949 | 2189 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron 1005M | Intel Pentium 2020M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge | Ivy Bridge |
| Launch date | 1 July 2013 | 1 October 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | $134 |
| Place in performance rating | 2770 | 2480 |
| Processor Number | 1005M | 2020M |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor 1000 Series | Intel® Pentium® Processor 2000 Series |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Price now | $134 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 5.01 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.90 GHz | 2.40 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 5 GT/s DMI |
| Die size | 94 mm | 118 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 2048 KB | 2048 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 90 °C |
| Maximum frequency | 1.9 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 1400 million | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 650 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.00 GHz | 1.10 GHz |
| Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | Intel HD Graphics |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| CRT | ||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
| SDVO | ||
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mmx37.5mm (rPGA988B) | 37.5mm x 37.5mm (rPGA988B) |
| Sockets supported | FCPGA988 | FCPGA988 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Celeron 1005M with others
IntelCeleron 1005M vs
IntelCore Duo T2700
IntelCeleron 1005M vs
IntelCore 2 Duo SP9400
IntelCeleron 1005M vs
IntelCore i7-3517U
IntelCeleron 1005M vs
AMDGX-217GA
