Intel Celeron 1005M vs Intel Pentium 2020M
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Celeron 1005M und Intel Pentium 2020M Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Celeron 1005M
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 9 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 17% höhere Kerntemperatur: 105 °C vs 90 °C
- Etwa 39% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.937 vs 2.116
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 1 July 2013 vs 1 October 2012 |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 105 °C vs 90 °C |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.937 vs 2.116 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Pentium 2020M
- Etwa 26% höhere Taktfrequenz: 2.4 GHz vs 1.9 GHz
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1274 vs 1017
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 1396 vs 1113
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 426 vs 339
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 796 vs 633
- 4.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 70.755 vs 16.453
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.372 vs 0.149
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 3.787 vs 3.522
- 3.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.032 vs 1.277
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2189 vs 1949
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2189 vs 1949
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 2.4 GHz vs 1.9 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1274 vs 1017 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1396 vs 1113 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 426 vs 339 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 796 vs 633 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 70.755 vs 16.453 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.372 vs 0.149 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.787 vs 3.522 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.032 vs 1.277 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2189 vs 1949 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2189 vs 1949 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Celeron 1005M
CPU 2: Intel Pentium 2020M
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron 1005M | Intel Pentium 2020M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1017 | 1274 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1113 | 1396 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 339 | 426 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 633 | 796 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.937 | 2.116 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.453 | 70.755 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.149 | 0.372 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.522 | 3.787 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.277 | 4.032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1949 | 2189 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1949 | 2189 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Celeron 1005M | Intel Pentium 2020M | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Ivy Bridge | Ivy Bridge |
| Startdatum | 1 July 2013 | 1 October 2012 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $86 | $134 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 2770 | 2480 |
| Processor Number | 1005M | 2020M |
| Serie | Intel® Celeron® Processor 1000 Series | Intel® Pentium® Processor 2000 Series |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Vertikales Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Jetzt kaufen | $134 | |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 5.01 | |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 1.90 GHz | 2.40 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 5 GT/s DMI |
| Matrizengröße | 94 mm | 118 mm |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 Cache | 2048 KB | 2048 KB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 105 °C | 90 °C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 1.9 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 2 | 2 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 2 | 2 |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1400 million | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 |
Grafik |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 650 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.00 GHz | 1.10 GHz |
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 1 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® Clear Video Technologie | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel HD Graphics | Intel HD Graphics |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| CRT | ||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | 3 |
| SDVO | ||
| Unterstützung für Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mmx37.5mm (rPGA988B) | 37.5mm x 37.5mm (rPGA988B) |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FCPGA988 | FCPGA988 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express Revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Anti-Theft Technologie | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Befehlssatzerweiterungen | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® My WiFi Technologie | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Celeron 1005M mit anderen
IntelCeleron 1005M vs
IntelCore Duo T2700
IntelCeleron 1005M vs
IntelCore 2 Duo SP9400
IntelCeleron 1005M vs
IntelCore i7-3517U
IntelCeleron 1005M vs
AMDGX-217GA
