Intel Celeron J1900 vs AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+

Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron J1900 and AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

Intel Celeron J1900

AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron J1900

CPU is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 8 month(s) later
2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 90 nm
2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
12.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 125 Watt
Around 24% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1151 vs 930
Around 33% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 686 vs 514
2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.068 vs 1.495
3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 11.336 vs 3.655
Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.139 vs 0.078

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 November 2013 vs February 2007
Number of cores	4 vs 2
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm vs 90 nm
L2 cache	2 MB vs 1024 KB
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	10 Watt vs 125 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - CPU mark	1151 vs 930
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	686 vs 514
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	3.068 vs 1.495
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	11.336 vs 3.655
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.139 vs 0.078

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+

Around 24% higher clock speed: 3 GHz vs 2.42 GHz
Around 14% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
Around 60% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1039 vs 651
Around 37% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 288 vs 210
Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.013 vs 1.753

Specifications (specs)
Maximum frequency	3 GHz vs 2.42 GHz
L1 cache	256 KB vs 224 KB
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark	1039 vs 651
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	288 vs 210
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	2.013 vs 1.753

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Celeron J1900
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+

PassMark - Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

651

1039

PassMark - CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

1151

930

Geekbench 4 - Single Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

210

288

Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

686

514

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

3.068

1.495

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

11.336

3.655

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

0.139

0.078

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

1.753

2.013

Name	Intel Celeron J1900	AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+
PassMark - Single thread mark	651	1039
PassMark - CPU mark	1151	930
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	210	288
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	686	514
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	3.068	1.495
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	11.336	3.655
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.139	0.078
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	0.508
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1.753	2.013
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1007
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1007

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Celeron J1900	AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Essentials
Architecture codename	Bay Trail	Windsor
Launch date	1 November 2013	February 2007
Launch price (MSRP)	$82
Place in performance rating	3154	3147
Processor Number	J1900
Series	Intel® Celeron® Processor J Series
Status	Launched
Vertical segment	Desktop	Desktop
Price now		$32.50
Value for money (0-100)		14.55
Performance
64 bit support
Base frequency	2.00 GHz
L1 cache	224 KB	256 KB
L2 cache	2 MB	1024 KB
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm	90 nm
Maximum core temperature	105°C
Maximum frequency	2.42 GHz	3 GHz
Number of cores	4	2
Number of threads	4
Die size		220 mm
Transistor count		227 million
Memory
Max memory channels	2
Maximum memory size	8 GB
Supported memory types	DDR3L 1333
Graphics
Graphics base frequency	688 MHz
Graphics max dynamic frequency	854 MHz
Graphics max frequency	854 MHz
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI)
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology
Intel® Quick Sync Video
Processor graphics	Intel HD Graphics
Graphics interfaces
Number of displays supported	2
Wireless Display (WiDi) support
Compatibility
Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Package Size	25mm X 27mm
Sockets supported	FCBGA1170	AM2
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	10 Watt	125 Watt
Peripherals
Max number of PCIe lanes	4
PCI Express revision	2.0
PCIe configurations	X4, X2, X1
Security & Reliability
Anti-Theft technology
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Identity Protection technology
Advanced Technologies
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
Flexible Display interface (FDI)
Intel 64
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported
Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST)
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Physical Address Extensions (PAE)	36-bit
Virtualization
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)