Intel Celeron J1900 vs AMD E-350
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron J1900 and AMD E-350 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron J1900
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 51% higher clock speed: 2.42 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 75% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 18 Watt
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 652 vs 487
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1151 vs 425
- Around 56% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 210 vs 135
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 686 vs 250
- 5.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.068 vs 0.522
- 5.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 11.336 vs 1.936
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.139 vs 0.036
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.753 vs 0.725
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 November 2013 vs 9 November 2010 |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 2.42 GHz vs 1.6 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 40 nm |
L1 cache | 224 KB vs 128 KB |
L2 cache | 2 MB vs 1024 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 18 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 652 vs 487 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1151 vs 425 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 210 vs 135 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 686 vs 250 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.068 vs 0.522 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 11.336 vs 1.936 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.139 vs 0.036 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.753 vs 0.725 |
Reasons to consider the AMD E-350
- 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 2.275 vs 0.508
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1798 vs 1007
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1798 vs 1007
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.275 vs 0.508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1798 vs 1007 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1798 vs 1007 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron J1900
CPU 2: AMD E-350
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Celeron J1900 | AMD E-350 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 652 | 487 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1151 | 425 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 210 | 135 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 686 | 250 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.068 | 0.522 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 11.336 | 1.936 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.139 | 0.036 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.508 | 2.275 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.753 | 0.725 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1007 | 1798 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1007 | 1798 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 244 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 887 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 244 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 887 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Celeron J1900 | AMD E-350 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Bay Trail | Zacate |
Launch date | 1 November 2013 | 9 November 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $82 | |
Place in performance rating | 3166 | 3015 |
Processor Number | J1900 | |
Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor J Series | AMD E-Series |
Status | Launched | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.00 GHz | |
L1 cache | 224 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1024 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C | |
Maximum frequency | 2.42 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
Die size | 75 mm | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 2 | |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | |
Supported memory types | DDR3L 1333 | DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
Graphics base frequency | 688 MHz | |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 854 MHz | |
Graphics max frequency | 854 MHz | |
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
Number of displays supported | 2 | |
Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 25mm X 27mm | |
Sockets supported | FCBGA1170 | FT1 BGA 413-Ball |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 18 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
Max number of PCIe lanes | 4 | |
PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
PCIe configurations | X4, X2, X1 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Anti-Theft technology | ||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST) | ||
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | |
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |