Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 versus Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 et Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Compatibilité, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core 2 Duo P7550
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 1 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 40% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 25 Watt versus 35 Watt
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 974 versus 969
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 October 2009 versus 10 January 2008 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt versus 35 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 974 versus 969 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
- Environ 6% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 2.4 GHz versus 2.26 GHz
- Environ 17% température maximale du noyau plus haut: 105°C versus 90°C
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 894 versus 849
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 321 versus 291
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 535 versus 505
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.259 versus 0.247
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 15.787 versus 15.219
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.075 versus 0.073
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.479 versus 0.448
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.875 versus 1.772
| Caractéristiques | |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.4 GHz versus 2.26 GHz |
| Température de noyau maximale | 105°C versus 90°C |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 894 versus 849 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 321 versus 291 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 535 versus 505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.259 versus 0.247 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.787 versus 15.219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.075 versus 0.073 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.479 versus 0.448 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.875 versus 1.772 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo P7550
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 | Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 974 | 969 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 849 | 894 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 291 | 321 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 505 | 535 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.247 | 0.259 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.219 | 15.787 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.073 | 0.075 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.448 | 0.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.772 | 1.875 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 | Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Penryn | Penryn |
| Date de sortie | 1 October 2009 | 10 January 2008 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 3197 | 3196 |
| Prix maintenant | $229.99 | $213.99 |
| Processor Number | P7550 | T8300 |
| Série | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 1.94 | 2.03 |
| Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $241 | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2.26 GHz | 2.40 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 800 MHz FSB |
| Taille de dé | 107 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Cache L2 | 3 MB | 3072 KB |
| Processus de fabrication | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | 105°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.26 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 2 | 2 |
| Compte de transistor | 410 million | 410 million |
| Rangée de tension VID | 1.000V-1.250V | |
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | 35mm x 35mm |
| Prise courants soutenu | PGA478 | PGA478, BGA479 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 35 Watt |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 avec des autres
IntelCore 2 Duo P7550 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo P8600
IntelCore 2 Duo P7550 vs
IntelCeleron Dual-Core SU2300
IntelCore 2 Duo P7550 vs
IntelCore i3-2377M
