Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7600
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 and Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400
- Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 100°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 34 Watt
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 100°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
| L2 cache | 6134 KB vs 4096 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt vs 34 Watt |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T7600
- Around 25% higher clock speed: 2.33 GHz vs 1.86 GHz
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 844 vs 786
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 799 vs 759
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 268 vs 261
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 472 vs 463
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.245 vs 0.202
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 16.014 vs 15.868
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.072 vs 0.06
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.35 vs 0.241
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.698 vs 1.428
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.33 GHz vs 1.86 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 844 vs 786 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 799 vs 759 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 268 vs 261 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 472 vs 463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.245 vs 0.202 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.014 vs 15.868 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.072 vs 0.06 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.35 vs 0.241 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.698 vs 1.428 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T7600
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 | Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 786 | 844 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 759 | 799 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 261 | 268 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 463 | 472 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.202 | 0.245 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.868 | 16.014 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.06 | 0.072 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.241 | 0.35 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.428 | 1.698 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 | Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Penryn | Merom |
| Launch date | 20 August 2008 | Q3'07 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $284 | $619 |
| Place in performance rating | 3245 | 3228 |
| Price now | $253 | |
| Processor Number | SL9400 | T7600 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.47 | |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.86 GHz | 2.33 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 667 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 143 mm2 |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | 667 MHz |
| L2 cache | 6134 KB | 4096 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 1.86 GHz | 2.33 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 410 million | 291 million |
| VID voltage range | 1.050V - 1.150V | 1.0375V-1.300V |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 22mm x 22mm | 35mm x 35mm |
| Sockets supported | BGA956 | PPGA478, PBGA479 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt | 34 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 0 W | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 with others
IntelCore 2 Duo SL9400 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo T7300
IntelCore 2 Duo SL9400 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo P7350
IntelCore 2 Duo SL9400 vs
IntelAtom N475
