Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P8600
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 and Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T9900
- CPU is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher clock speed: 3.06 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1190 vs 942
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1199 vs 854
- Around 45% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 444 vs 306
- Around 41% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 760 vs 538
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.324 vs 0.261
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 23.559 vs 16.1
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.094 vs 0.074
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.622 vs 0.498
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.322 vs 1.788
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 April 2009 vs 15 July 2008 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.06 GHz vs 2.4 GHz |
| L2 cache | 6134 KB vs 3072 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1190 vs 942 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1199 vs 854 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 444 vs 306 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 760 vs 538 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.324 vs 0.261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 23.559 vs 16.1 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.094 vs 0.074 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.622 vs 0.498 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.322 vs 1.788 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo P8600
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 35 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo T9900
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 | Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1190 | 942 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1199 | 854 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 444 | 306 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 760 | 538 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.324 | 0.261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 23.559 | 16.1 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.094 | 0.074 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.622 | 0.498 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.322 | 1.788 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 | Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Penryn | Penryn |
| Launch date | 1 April 2009 | 15 July 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $530 | $209 |
| Place in performance rating | 3070 | 3208 |
| Price now | $398.95 | $49.18 |
| Processor Number | T9900 | P8600 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.57 | 9.20 |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3.06 GHz | 2.40 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 1066 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | 1066 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 6134 KB | 3072 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 105°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.06 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 410 million | 410 million |
| VID voltage range | 1.050V-1.2125V | 1.050V-1.150V |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 35mm | 35 mm x 35mm |
| Sockets supported | BGA479, PGA478 | PGA478, BGA479 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 with others
IntelCore 2 Duo T9900 vs
IntelPentium M 1.50
IntelCore 2 Duo T9900 vs
IntelCore i3-2365M
IntelCore 2 Duo T9900 vs
IntelCeleron N2920
