Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 vs AMD A4-3300
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 and AMD A4-3300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Memory. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1220 vs 973
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2348 vs 942
- Around 50% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 412 vs 274
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1299 vs 445
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.175 vs 0.104
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.476 vs 1.739
Specifications (specs) | |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1220 vs 973 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2348 vs 942 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 412 vs 274 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1299 vs 445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.175 vs 0.104 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.476 vs 1.739 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A4-3300
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 45 nm
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.503 vs 0.612
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 71.876 vs 30.904
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 3.657 vs 1.258
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 45 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.503 vs 0.612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 71.876 vs 30.904 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.657 vs 1.258 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
CPU 2: AMD A4-3300
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 | AMD A4-3300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1220 | 973 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2348 | 942 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 412 | 274 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1299 | 445 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.612 | 1.503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30.904 | 71.876 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.175 | 0.104 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.258 | 3.657 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.476 | 1.739 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 360 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 360 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 | AMD A4-3300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Yorkfield | Llano |
Launch date | Q1'08 | September 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 3015 | 3000 |
Processor Number | Q9550 | |
Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.83 GHz | |
Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | |
Die size | 214 mm2 | 228 mm |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 32 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 71.4°C | |
Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
Transistor count | 820 million | 1178 million |
VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | |
Maximum frequency | 2.5 GHz | |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Sockets supported | LGA775 | FM1 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 |