Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 versus AMD A4-3300

Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 et AMD A4-3300 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Compatibilité, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Mémoire. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550

versus

AMD A4-3300

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550

2 plus de noyaux, lancer plus d’applications á la fois: 4 versus 2
Environ 25% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1220 versus 973
2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2348 versus 942
Environ 50% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 412 versus 274
2.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1299 versus 445
Environ 68% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.175 versus 0.104
2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.476 versus 1.739

Caractéristiques
Nombre de noyaux	4 versus 2
Référence
PassMark - Single thread mark	1220 versus 973
PassMark - CPU mark	2348 versus 942
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	412 versus 274
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	1299 versus 445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.175 versus 0.104
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	4.476 versus 1.739

Raisons pour considerer le AMD A4-3300

Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 32 nm versus 45 nm
Environ 46% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 65 Watt versus 95 Watt
2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.503 versus 0.612
2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 71.876 versus 30.904
2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 3.657 versus 1.258

Caractéristiques
Processus de fabrication	32 nm versus 45 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt versus 95 Watt
Référence
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	1.503 versus 0.612
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	71.876 versus 30.904
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	3.657 versus 1.258

Comparer les références

CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
CPU 2: AMD A4-3300

PassMark - Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

1220

973

PassMark - CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

2348

942

Geekbench 4 - Single Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

412

274

Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

1299

445

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

0.612

1.503

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

30.904

71.876

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

0.175

0.104

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

1.258

3.657

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

4.476

1.739

Nom	Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550	AMD A4-3300
PassMark - Single thread mark	1220	973
PassMark - CPU mark	2348	942
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	412	274
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	1299	445
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score	0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	0.612	1.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	30.904	71.876
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.175	0.104
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	1.258	3.657
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	4.476	1.739
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		360

Comparer les caractéristiques

	Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550	AMD A4-3300
Essentiel
Nom de code de l’architecture	Yorkfield	Llano
Date de sortie	Q1'08	September 2011
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	3015	3000
Processor Number	Q9550
Série	Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Status	Discontinued
Segment vertical	Desktop	Desktop
Performance
Soutien de 64-bit
Base frequency	2.83 GHz
Bus Speed	1333 MHz FSB
Taille de dé	214 mm2	228 mm
Processus de fabrication	45 nm	32 nm
Température de noyau maximale	71.4°C
Nombre de noyaux	4	2
Compte de transistor	820 million	1178 million
Rangée de tension VID	0.8500V-1.3625V
Cache L1		128 KB (per core)
Cache L2		512 KB (per core)
Fréquence maximale		2.5 GHz
Compatibilité
Low Halogen Options Available
Package Size	37.5mm x 37.5mm
Prise courants soutenu	LGA775	FM1
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	95 Watt	65 Watt
Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration		1
Sécurité & fiabilité
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT)
Technologies élevé
Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep®
FSB parity
Idle States
Intel 64
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading
Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost
Thermal Monitoring
Virtualization
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
Mémoire
Genres de mémoire soutenus		DDR3