AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 58% higher boost clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1392 MHz
- 302.4x more texture fill rate: 17.60 GTexel/s vs 58.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 14 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
Launch date | 3 Jan 2023 vs 25 October 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 1392 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 GTexel/s vs 58.2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
- 3.2x more core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 5x more pipelines: 640 vs 128
- 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17466 vs 5090
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 457 vs 265
- 4.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5029 vs 1103
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1290 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Pipelines | 640 vs 128 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17466 vs 5090 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 457 vs 265 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5029 vs 1103 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5090 | 17466 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 265 | 457 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1103 | 5029 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7043 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7043 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 122 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Dragon Range | GP107 |
Launch date | 3 Jan 2023 | 25 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 840 | 586 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Price now | $124.99 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 56.95 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2200 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Compute units | 2 | |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 1290 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 35.20 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1,126 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 563.2 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 128 | 640 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.800 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 GTexel/s | 58.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,862 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 112 GB / s |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 7008 MHz |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
VR Ready |