AMD Radeon PRO W6400 vs NVIDIA TITAN V
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO W6400 and NVIDIA TITAN V videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO W6400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 70% higher core clock speed: 2039 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 60% higher boost clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- 239.3x more texture fill rate: 111.4 GTexel/s vs 465.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 12 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 18% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1700 MHz
Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 vs 7 December 2017 |
Core clock speed | 2039 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 111.4 GTexel/s vs 465.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1700 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN V
- 6.7x more pipelines: 5120 vs 768
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 871 vs 768
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20019 vs 8027
- 4.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 156912 vs 34464
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 768 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 871 vs 768 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20019 vs 8027 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 156912 vs 34464 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO W6400
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN V
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon PRO W6400 | NVIDIA TITAN V |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 768 | 871 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8027 | 20019 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34464 | 156912 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.561 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3583.136 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 30.857 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.669 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1504.373 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15401 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4193 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15401 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4193 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13249 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon PRO W6400 | NVIDIA TITAN V | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Volta |
Code name | Navi 24 | GV100 |
Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 | 7 December 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 153 | 150 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2321 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Compute units | 12 | |
Core clock speed | 2039 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.130 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.565 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 5120 |
Pixel fill rate | 74.27 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 111.4 GTexel/s | 465.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 5400 million | 21,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 14,899 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 652.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 3072 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1700 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |