AMD Radeon RX 6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 58% higher core clock speed: 1923 MHz vs 1215 MHz
- Around 68% higher boost clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1379 MHz
- 631.2x more texture fill rate: 111.4 GTexel/s vs 176.5 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 53 Watt vs 115 Watt
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 699 vs 428
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 vs 27 June 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1923 MHz vs 1215 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 1379 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 111.4 GTexel/s vs 176.5 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt vs 115 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 699 vs 428 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
- 2.7x more pipelines: 2048 vs 768
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9936 vs 7585
- Around 37% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4887 vs 3579
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41185 vs 32705
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 768 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9936 vs 7585 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4887 vs 3579 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41185 vs 32705 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6400 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 699 | 428 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7585 | 9936 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3579 | 4887 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 32705 | 41185 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 214.123 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2293.496 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.704 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.717 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 692.9 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14915 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8902 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8048 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14915 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8902 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8048 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 6400 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Navi 24 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 | 27 June 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 236 | 233 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2321 MHz | 1379 MHz |
| Compute units | 12 | |
| Core clock speed | 1923 MHz | 1215 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.130 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.565 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 74.27 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 111.4 GTexel/s | 176.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5400 million | 7,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 5,648 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Single-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 256.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 8008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 6400 with others
AMDRadeon RX 6400 vs
AMDRadeon R9 FURY X
AMDRadeon RX 6400 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000 24 GB
AMDRadeon RX 6400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX 6400 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48
AMDRadeon RX 6400 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700
AMDRadeon RX 6400 vs
AppleM2 Max 30-core
