AMD Radeon RX 6400 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6400 and NVIDIA Quadro P1000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1923 MHz vs 1266 MHz
- Around 57% higher boost clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1480 MHz
- 1881.8x more texture fill rate: 111.4 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 717 vs 590
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7651 vs 4500
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33004 vs 15667
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 vs 7 February 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1923 MHz vs 1266 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 1480 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 111.4 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 512 |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 14 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 717 vs 590 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7651 vs 4500 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33004 vs 15667 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 53 Watt
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
- 9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1591 vs 176
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 53 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1591 vs 176 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6400
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6400 | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 717 | 590 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7651 | 4500 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 176 | 1591 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33004 | 15667 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.86 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 832.248 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.039 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.117 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.081 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6400 | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 24 | GP107 |
Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 | 7 February 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 279 | 517 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $375 | |
Price now | $319.99 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.53 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2321 MHz | 1480 MHz |
Compute units | 12 | |
Core clock speed | 1923 MHz | 1266 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.130 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.565 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 512 |
Pixel fill rate | 74.27 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 111.4 GTexel/s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt | 47 Watt |
Transistor count | 5400 million | 3,300 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 145 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 80.19 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |