AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• 2.8x more core clock speed: 2150 MHz vs 780 MHz
• 2x more boost clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 1290 MHz
• 2x more texture fill rate: 416.0 GTexel/s vs 206.4 GTexel/s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
• Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
• Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 960 vs 645
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20781 vs 15401
• Around 29% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13533 vs 10457
• Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 106974 vs 92447
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7156.733 vs 4619.617

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q

• 2x more pipelines: 5120 vs 2560
• 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 449.647 vs 359.653
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 36.308 vs 34.495
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 181.818 vs 118.072
• Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1410.887 vs 866.201

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	960 645
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	20781 15401
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	13533 10457
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	106974 92447
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	359.653 449.647
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7156.733 4619.617
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	34.495 36.308
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	118.072 181.818
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	866.201 1410.887

Compare specifications (specs)