AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
- Around 54% higher core clock speed: 2150 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Around 53% higher boost clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- Around 70% higher texture fill rate: 416.0 GTexel/s vs 244.1 GTexel/s
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 954 vs 757
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20827 vs 19620
- Around 8% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13507 vs 12488
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 359.653 vs 319.688
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 2150 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2600 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 416.0 GTexel/s vs 244.1 GTexel/s |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 954 vs 757 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20827 vs 19620 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13507 vs 12488 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 359.653 vs 319.688 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 80% higher pipelines: 4608 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 7 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 107739 vs 106604
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 36.174 vs 34.495
- Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 218.946 vs 118.072
- Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1585.54 vs 866.201
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2023 vs 3 Mar 2022 |
Pipelines | 4608 vs 2560 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 7 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 107739 vs 106604 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 36.174 vs 34.495 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 218.946 vs 118.072 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1585.54 vs 866.201 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 954 | 757 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20827 | 19620 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13507 | 12488 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 106604 | 107739 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 359.653 | 319.688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7156.733 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 34.495 | 36.174 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.072 | 218.946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 866.201 | 1585.54 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
Code name | Navi 22 | AD106 |
Launch date | 3 Mar 2022 | 2023 |
Place in performance rating | 80 | 79 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2600 MHz | 1695 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 2150 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 4 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 832.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | 244.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.62 TFLOPS (2:1) | 15.62 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.31 TFLOPS | 15.62 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2560 | 4608 |
Pixel fill rate | 166.4 GPixel/s | 81.36 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 416.0 GTexel/s | 244.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 115 Watt |
Transistor count | 17200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | IGP |
Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | 110 mm, 4.3 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 432.0 GB/s | 256.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |