AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

  • Around 54% higher core clock speed: 2150 MHz vs 1395 MHz
  • Around 53% higher boost clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 1695 MHz
  • Around 70% higher texture fill rate: 416.0 GTexel/s vs 244.1 GTexel/s
  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
  • Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
  • Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 951 vs 762
  • Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20820 vs 19556
  • Around 8% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13507 vs 12488
  • Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 359.653 vs 319.688
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 2150 MHz vs 1395 MHz
Boost clock speed 2600 MHz vs 1695 MHz
Texture fill rate 416.0 GTexel/s vs 244.1 GTexel/s
Maximum memory size 12 GB vs 8 GB
Memory clock speed 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 951 vs 762
PassMark - G3D Mark 20820 vs 19556
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 13507 vs 12488
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 359.653 vs 319.688

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • Around 80% higher pipelines: 4608 vs 2560
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 7 nm
  • 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 107449 vs 106163
  • Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 36.174 vs 34.495
  • Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 218.946 vs 118.072
  • Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1585.54 vs 866.201
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2023 vs 3 Mar 2022
Pipelines 4608 vs 2560
Manufacturing process technology 4 nm vs 7 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 115 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 107449 vs 106163
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 36.174 vs 34.495
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 218.946 vs 118.072
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1585.54 vs 866.201

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
951
762
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
20820
19556
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
13507
12488
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
106163
107449
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
359.653
319.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
34.495
36.174
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
118.072
218.946
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
866.201
1585.54
Name AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
PassMark - G2D Mark 951 762
PassMark - G3D Mark 20820 19556
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 13507 12488
Geekbench - OpenCL 106163 107449
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 359.653 319.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 7156.733
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 34.495 36.174
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 118.072 218.946
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 866.201 1585.54

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 2.0 Ada Lovelace
Code name Navi 22 AD106
Launch date 3 Mar 2022 2023
Place in performance rating 80 79

Technical info

Boost clock speed 2600 MHz 1695 MHz
Compute units 40
Core clock speed 2150 MHz 1395 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 4 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 832.0 GFLOPS (1:16) 244.1 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 26.62 TFLOPS (2:1) 15.62 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 13.31 TFLOPS 15.62 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2560 4608
Pixel fill rate 166.4 GPixel/s 81.36 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 416.0 GTexel/s 244.1 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 250 Watt 115 Watt
Transistor count 17200 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a Portable Device Dependent

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor Dual-slot IGP
Height 40 mm, 1.6 inches
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
Length 267 mm, 10.5 inches
Recommended system power (PSU) 600 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin None
Width 110 mm, 4.3 inches

API support

DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) 12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL 2.1 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.7 6.7
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 432.0 GB/s 256.0 GB/s
Memory bus width 192 bit 128 bit
Memory clock speed 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6