AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT vs AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1860 MHz vs 1825 MHz
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 2310 MHz vs 2250 MHz
- Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 739.2 GTexel/s vs 648.0 GTexel/s
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 4608
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1054 vs 1025
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 28097 vs 25004
- Around 15% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4235 vs 3689
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 174868 vs 154220
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 May 2022 vs 28 Oct 2020 |
Core clock speed | 1860 MHz vs 1825 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2310 MHz vs 2250 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 739.2 GTexel/s vs 648.0 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 4608 |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1054 vs 1025 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 28097 vs 25004 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4235 vs 3689 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 174868 vs 154220 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
- Around 12% lower typical power consumption: 300 Watt vs 335 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt vs 335 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT | AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1054 | 1025 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 28097 | 25004 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4235 | 3689 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 174868 | 154220 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 578.52 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 52.561 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 291.971 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2700.97 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16849 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3374 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16849 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3374 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT | AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
Code name | Navi 21 | Navi 21 |
Launch date | 10 May 2022 | 28 Oct 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 37 | 71 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2310 MHz | 2250 MHz |
Compute units | 80 | 72 |
Core clock speed | 1860 MHz | 1825 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,478 GFLOPS (1:16) | 1296 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 47.31 TFLOPS (2:1) | 41.47 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 23.65 TFLOPS | 20.74 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 5120 | 4608 |
Pixel fill rate | 295.7 GPixel/s | 288.0 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 739.2 GTexel/s | 648.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 335 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 26800 million | 26800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Triple-slot | |
Height | 50 mm, 2 inches | 50 mm (2 inches) |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | 700 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Width | 120 mm, 4.7 inches | 120 mm (4.7 inches) |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 576.0 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |