AMD Radeon RX 9070 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 9070 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 9070
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 2520 MHz vs 1710 MHz
- Around 22% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2944
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1276 vs 908
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 24879 vs 18750
- Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138234 vs 105219
- 3.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6290 vs 1752
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 6 Mar 2025 vs 20 September 2018 |
| Boost clock speed | 2520 MHz vs 1710 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3584 vs 2944 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 12 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1276 vs 908 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 24879 vs 18750 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 138234 vs 105219 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6290 vs 1752 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1330 MHz
- Around 2% lower typical power consumption: 215 Watt vs 220 Watt
- 5.6x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2518 MHz, 20.1 Gbps effective
| Core clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 1330 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt vs 220 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2518 MHz, 20.1 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 9070
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 9070 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1276 | 908 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 24879 | 18750 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 138234 | 105219 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6290 | 1752 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 326.494 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 9070 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 4.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 48 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 6 Mar 2025 | 20 September 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 31 | 105 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
| Price now | $749.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2520 MHz | 1710 MHz |
| Compute units | 56 | |
| Core clock speed | 1330 MHz | 1515 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Pipelines | 3584 | 2944 |
| Pixel fill rate | 322.6 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 564.5 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt | 215 Watt |
| Transistor count | 53900 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 644.6 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2518 MHz, 20.1 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |