AMD FirePro 2270 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro 2270 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro 2270
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 87% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 28 Watt
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 173 vs 50
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 January 2011 vs 15 June 2009 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 28 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 173 vs 50 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M
- 3.3x more texture fill rate: 16 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 96 vs 80
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 240 gflops vs 96 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 554 vs 142
- 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8215 vs 2564
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 16 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 96 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 240 gflops vs 96 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 554 vs 142 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8215 vs 2564 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro 2270
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro 2270 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 142 | 554 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 173 | 50 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2564 | 8215 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.145 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.382 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 539 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 539 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1231 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1231 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro 2270 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Cedar | GT215 |
Launch date | 31 January 2011 | 15 June 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1539 | 1541 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 96 gflops | 240 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 80 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 4.8 GTexel / s | 16 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 28 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 727 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Gigaflops | 360 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DMS-59 | HDMIVGALVDSSingle Link DVIDisplayPortDual Link DVI |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 170 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 9.6 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
SLI |