AMD FirePro D500 vs AMD FirePro S9000
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro D500 and AMD FirePro S9000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro D500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 28% lower typical power consumption: 274 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 5.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.776 vs 9.541
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1063.081 vs 275.278
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.568 vs 1.886
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.789 vs 30.049
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 January 2014 vs 24 August 2012 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 274 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.776 vs 9.541 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.081 vs 275.278 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.568 vs 1.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.789 vs 30.049 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S9000
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 45% higher texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel / s vs 69.6 GTexel / s
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1536
- Around 45% better floating-point performance: 3,226 gflops vs 2,227 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 5080 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 3685
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 3685
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel / s vs 69.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 1536 |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops vs 2,227 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 3 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 5080 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 vs 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 vs 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3349 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro D500
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S9000
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro D500 | AMD FirePro S9000 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18079 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.776 | 9.541 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.081 | 275.278 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.568 | 1.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.789 | 30.049 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6020 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6020 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3357 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5059 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 561 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.842 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro D500 | AMD FirePro S9000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Tahiti | Tahiti |
Launch date | 18 January 2014 | 24 August 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 693 | 694 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 900 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,227 gflops | 3,226 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1792 |
Texture fill rate | 69.6 GTexel / s | 100.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 274 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 4,313 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI | 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 279 mm | 267 mm |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 243.8 GB / s | 264 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 5500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |