AMD FirePro D500 vs AMD FirePro S9000
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro D500 and AMD FirePro S9000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro D500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 28% lower typical power consumption: 274 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 5.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.776 vs 9.541
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1063.081 vs 275.278
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.568 vs 1.886
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.789 vs 30.049
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 January 2014 vs 24 August 2012 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 274 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.776 vs 9.541 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.081 vs 275.278 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.568 vs 1.886 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.789 vs 30.049 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S9000
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 45% higher texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel / s vs 69.6 GTexel / s
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1536
- Around 45% better floating-point performance: 3,226 gflops vs 2,227 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 5080 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 3685
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 3685
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 725 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel / s vs 69.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1792 vs 1536 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops vs 2,227 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 3 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 5080 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 vs 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 vs 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3349 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro D500
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S9000
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD FirePro D500 | AMD FirePro S9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18062 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.776 | 9.541 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.081 | 275.278 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.568 | 1.886 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.789 | 30.049 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6020 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6020 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3357 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5059 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 561 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.842 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD FirePro D500 | AMD FirePro S9000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Tahiti | Tahiti |
| Launch date | 18 January 2014 | 24 August 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 693 | 694 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,227 gflops | 3,226 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 1792 |
| Texture fill rate | 69.6 GTexel / s | 100.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 274 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | 4,313 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI | 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 279 mm | 267 mm |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 243.8 GB / s | 264 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 5500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD FirePro D500 with others
AMDFirePro D500 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4670
AMDFirePro D500 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6970
AMDFirePro D500 vs
AMDFirePro S9000
AMDFirePro D500 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 455
AMDFirePro D500 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 (Laptop)
AMDFirePro D500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX350
