AMD FirePro W5170M vs AMD FirePro D500
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W5170M and AMD FirePro D500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5170M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 725 MHz
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 25 August 2014 vs 18 January 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 725 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3349 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro D500
- Around 88% higher texture fill rate: 69.6 GTexel / s vs 37 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 640
- Around 88% better floating-point performance: 2,227 gflops vs 1,184 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 4500 MHz
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18049 vs 8045
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6020 vs 3409
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6020 vs 3409
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 3189
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 3189
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 69.6 GTexel / s vs 37 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 640 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,227 gflops vs 1,184 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz vs 4500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18049 vs 8045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6020 vs 3409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6020 vs 3409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 vs 3189 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 vs 3189 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W5170M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro D500
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD FirePro W5170M | AMD FirePro D500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1788 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 366 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8045 | 18049 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3409 | 6020 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3409 | 6020 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3189 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3189 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3349 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.776 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.081 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.568 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.789 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD FirePro W5170M | AMD FirePro D500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Tropo | Tahiti |
| Launch date | 25 August 2014 | 18 January 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 682 | 683 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops | 2,227 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
| Texture fill rate | 37 GTexel / s | 69.6 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 4,313 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 274 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Length | 279 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 243.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Enduro | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD FirePro W5170M with others
AMDFirePro W5170M vs
IntelHD Graphics 2000
AMDFirePro W5170M vs
IntelHD Graphics P4600
AMDFirePro W5170M vs
AMDFirePro D500
AMDFirePro W5170M vs
NVIDIAQuadro M600M
AMDFirePro W5170M vs
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM
AMDFirePro W5170M vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
