NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs AMD FirePro D700
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) and AMD FirePro D700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 850 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 274 Watt
- Around 28% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5480 MHz
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7043 vs 6051
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7043 vs 6051
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 25 October 2016 vs 18 January 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz vs 850 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 274 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 5480 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7043 vs 6051 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7043 vs 6051 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3348 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro D700
- Around 87% higher texture fill rate: 108.8 GTexel / s vs 58.2 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 640
- Around 87% better floating-point performance: 3,482 gflops vs 1,862 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 25284 vs 17478
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 74.325 vs 67.209
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1338.806 vs 799.414
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.419 vs 4.536
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 91.354 vs 30.523
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3685
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3685
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 108.8 GTexel / s vs 58.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 640 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,482 gflops vs 1,862 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 25284 vs 17478 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 74.325 vs 67.209 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1338.806 vs 799.414 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.419 vs 4.536 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.354 vs 30.523 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3685 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD FirePro D700
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | AMD FirePro D700 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5036 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 461 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17478 | 25284 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | 74.325 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | 1338.806 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | 6.419 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | 91.354 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7043 | 6051 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7043 | 6051 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3348 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1798 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | AMD FirePro D700 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GP107 | Tahiti |
| Launch date | 25 October 2016 | 18 January 2014 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Place in performance rating | 589 | 591 |
| Price now | $124.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 56.95 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz | 850 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,862 gflops | 3,482 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 640 | 2048 |
| Texture fill rate | 58.2 GTexel / s | 108.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 274 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 4,313 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 279 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | 263.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 5480 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder X1800 XL
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIATesla C2050
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
AMDFirePro D700
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M2000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAT1000
