NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs AMD FirePro D700

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P620 and AMD FirePro D700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 850 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 6.9x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 274 Watt
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 vs 3718
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 vs 3348
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 vs 3718
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 vs 3348

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro D700

• 2.3x more texture fill rate: 108.8 GTexel / s vs 46.56 GTexel / s
• 4x more pipelines: 2048 vs 512
• 2.3x better floating-point performance: 3,482 gflops vs 1,490 gflops
• 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 5480 MHz vs 5012 MHz
• 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 25131 vs 12475
• Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 74.325 vs 43.877
• Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1338.806 vs 773.248
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.419 vs 3.082
• Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 91.354 vs 53.425
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6051 vs 3575
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6051 vs 3575

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: AMD FirePro D700

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12475 25131
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	43.877 74.325
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	773.248 1338.806
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.082 6.419
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	53.425 91.354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3575 6051
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3881 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6631 3348
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3575 6051
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3881 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6631 3348

Compare specifications (specs)