AMD FirePro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M2000 and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M2000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher texture fill rate: 12 GTexel / s vs 9.2 GTexel / s
- 15x more pipelines: 480 vs 32
- 6.5x better floating-point performance: 480.0 gflops vs 73.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 425 vs 208
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 206 vs 84
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 July 2012 vs 9 June 2007 |
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s vs 9.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 480 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops vs 73.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 80 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 425 vs 208 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 206 vs 84 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 65% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 33 Watt
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1857 vs 1709
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1857 vs 1709
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 33 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1857 vs 1709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1857 vs 1709 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro M2000 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 425 | 208 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 206 | 84 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1168 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.284 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 195.801 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.31 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.402 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.254 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 544 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1498 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1709 | 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 544 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1498 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1709 | 1857 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro M2000 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
Code name | Turks | G84 |
Launch date | 1 July 2012 | 9 June 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1489 | 1486 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 575 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 73.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 480 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s | 9.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 716 million | 289 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | n / a | |
Form factor | chip-down | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-HE |
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 22.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3, GDDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 | no |
Technologies |
||
Gigathread technology | ||
HDCP-capable | ||
PCI-E 16x | ||
PowerMizer 7.0 |