AMD FirePro M2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M2000 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M2000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 50% higher texture fill rate: 12 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s
• 15x more pipelines: 480 vs 32
• 6x better floating-point performance: 480.0 gflops vs 80 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
• 2x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 425 vs 122
• 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 207 vs 74

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M

• 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 33 Watt
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2058 vs 1709
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2058 vs 1709

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro M2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	425 122
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	207 74
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1709 2058
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1709 2058

Compare specifications (specs)