AMD Radeon R7 M260 vs AMD FirePro M2000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M260 and AMD FirePro M2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 88% higher core clock speed: 940 MHz vs 500 MHz
• Around 88% higher texture fill rate: 22.56 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s
• Around 50% better floating-point performance: 721.9 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 497 vs 425
• 4.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4841 vs 1171
• 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.249 vs 3.284
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.925 vs 0.31
• Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.992 vs 10.402
• Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 77.895 vs 44.254
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1404 vs 544
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1404 vs 544

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M2000

• Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
• 3.2x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 207 vs 121
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 195.801 vs 145.3
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1498 vs 1093
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1498 vs 1093

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M260
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M2000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	497 425
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	121 207
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4841 1171
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.249 3.284
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	145.3 195.801
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.925 0.31
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.992 10.402
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	77.895 44.254
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1404 544
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1093 1498
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1704 1709
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1404 544
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1093 1498
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1704 1709

Compare specifications (specs)