Intel HD Graphics 5500 vs AMD FirePro M2000
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 5500 and AMD FirePro M2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 592 vs 425
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 232 vs 206
- Around 94% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2265 vs 1168
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.422 vs 3.284
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 781 vs 544
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 781 vs 544
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 1 July 2012 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 33 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 592 vs 425 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 vs 206 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2265 vs 1168 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.422 vs 3.284 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 195.811 vs 195.801 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 781 vs 544 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 781 vs 544 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M2000
- 5x more core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 100 MHz
- 20x more pipelines: 480 vs 24
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1498 vs 754
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1709 vs 1397
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1498 vs 754
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1709 vs 1397
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 100 MHz |
Pipelines | 480 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1498 vs 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1709 vs 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1498 vs 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1709 vs 1397 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 5500
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M2000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 5500 | AMD FirePro M2000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 592 | 425 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 | 206 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2265 | 1168 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.422 | 3.284 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 195.811 | 195.801 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 781 | 544 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 754 | 1498 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1397 | 1709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 781 | 544 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 754 | 1498 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1397 | 1709 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 233 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.31 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.402 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.254 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 5500 | AMD FirePro M2000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 8.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Broadwell GT2 | Turks |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 1 July 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1484 | 1487 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 100 MHz | 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 480 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 33 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,300 million | 716 million |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | n / a | |
Form factor | chip-down | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |