AMD FirePro M2000 vs NVIDIA NVS 5100M

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M2000 and NVIDIA NVS 5100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M2000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 36% higher texture fill rate: 12 GTexel / s vs 8.8 GTexel / s
• 10x more pipelines: 480 vs 48
• 4.1x better floating-point performance: 480.0 gflops vs 116.16 gflops
• Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 35 Watt
• 2x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 425 vs 200
• 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 206 vs 62

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5100M

• Around 10% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 500 MHz
• 5.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6549 vs 1168
• Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2747 vs 1709
• Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2747 vs 1709

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro M2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 5100M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	425 200
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	206 62
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1168 6549
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1709 2747
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1709 2747

Compare specifications (specs)