AMD FirePro M4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 78% higher pipelines: 512 vs 288
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 3828 MHz
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.072 vs 27.232
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 79.304 vs 50.114
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3539 vs 3114
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3539 vs 3114
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 June 2012 vs 20 February 2012 |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 288 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 3828 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.072 vs 27.232 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 79.304 vs 50.114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3539 vs 3114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3539 vs 3114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3356 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 736 MHz vs 675 MHz
- Around 64% higher texture fill rate: 35.33 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
- Around 23% better floating-point performance: 847.9 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1851 vs 1596
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 467 vs 407
- Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7032 vs 5532
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.456 vs 15.659
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 618.773 vs 424.37
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.693 vs 1.67
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 vs 2189
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 vs 2189
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 736 MHz vs 675 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 35.33 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 847.9 gflops vs 691.2 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1851 vs 1596 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 467 vs 407 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7032 vs 5532 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.456 vs 15.659 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 618.773 vs 424.37 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.693 vs 1.67 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 vs 2189 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 vs 2189 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD FirePro M4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1596 | 1851 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 407 | 467 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5532 | 7032 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.659 | 18.456 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 424.37 | 618.773 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.67 | 1.693 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.072 | 27.232 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 79.304 | 50.114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2189 | 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3539 | 3114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2189 | 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3539 | 3114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD FirePro M4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Chelsea | GF114 |
| Launch date | 27 June 2012 | 20 February 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 935 | 936 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $89.99 | |
| Price now | $89.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 28.95 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 736 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 847.9 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 288 |
| Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s | 35.33 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,950 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | n / a | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 210 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 91.87 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 3828 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
