NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M vs AMD FirePro M4000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M and AMD FirePro M4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 45% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 675 MHz
• Around 45% higher texture fill rate: 31.36 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
• Around 9% better floating-point performance: 752.6 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 35% higher memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 4000 MHz
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1713 vs 1596
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 455.796 vs 424.37
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3093 vs 2189
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3093 vs 2189

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M4000

• Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
• Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 50 Watt
• Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 407 vs 333
• Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5532 vs 4928
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.659 vs 12.449
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.67 vs 1.295
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.072 vs 24.566
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 79.304 vs 28.025
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3539 vs 3504
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3539 vs 3504

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1713 1596
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	333 407
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4928 5532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.449 15.659
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	455.796 424.37
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.295 1.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.566 30.072
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.025 79.304
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3093 2189
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3504 3539
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3093 2189
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3504 3539
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3357

Compare specifications (specs)