AMD FirePro M4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M4000 and NVIDIA Quadro K1000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M4000
- Around 59% higher texture fill rate: 21.6 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 192
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 691.2 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
- Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1596 vs 772
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 407 vs 249
- 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5532 vs 1754
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.659 vs 4.636
- 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 424.37 vs 115.549
- 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.67 vs 0.454
- 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.072 vs 7.024
- 7.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 79.304 vs 10.485
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2189 vs 1162
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3539 vs 1695
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 2297
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2189 vs 1162
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3539 vs 1695
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 2297
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops vs 326.4 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 45 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1596 vs 772 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 407 vs 249 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5532 vs 1754 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.659 vs 4.636 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 424.37 vs 115.549 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.67 vs 0.454 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.072 vs 7.024 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 79.304 vs 10.485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2189 vs 1162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3539 vs 1695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 2297 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2189 vs 1162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3539 vs 1695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 2297 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 675 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 675 MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD FirePro M4000 | NVIDIA Quadro K1000M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1596 | 772 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 407 | 249 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5532 | 1754 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.659 | 4.636 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 424.37 | 115.549 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.67 | 0.454 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.072 | 7.024 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 79.304 | 10.485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2189 | 1162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3539 | 1695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 2297 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2189 | 1162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3539 | 1695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 2297 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD FirePro M4000 | NVIDIA Quadro K1000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Chelsea | GK107 |
| Launch date | 27 June 2012 | 1 June 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 935 | 1409 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $119.90 | |
| Price now | $149.90 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 6.18 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 192 |
| Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s | 13.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | n / a | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
