AMD FirePro M4000 versus NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro M4000 and NVIDIA Quadro K1000M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD FirePro M4000

versus

NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro M4000

Environ 59% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 21.6 GTexel / s versus 13.6 GTexel / s
2.7x plus de pipelines: 512 versus 192
2.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 691.2 gflops versus 326.4 gflops
Environ 36% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 45 Watt
2.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 1800 MHz
2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1596 versus 772
Environ 63% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 407 versus 249
3.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5532 versus 1754
3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.659 versus 4.636
3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 424.37 versus 115.549
3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.67 versus 0.454
4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.072 versus 7.024
7.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 79.304 versus 10.485
Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2189 versus 1162
2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3539 versus 1695
Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 2297
Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2189 versus 1162
2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3539 versus 1695
Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 2297

Caractéristiques
Taux de remplissage de la texture	21.6 GTexel / s versus 13.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	512 versus 192
Performance á point flottant	691.2 gflops versus 326.4 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	33 Watt versus 45 Watt
Vitesse de mémoire	4000 MHz versus 1800 MHz
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	1596 versus 772
PassMark - G2D Mark	407 versus 249
Geekbench - OpenCL	5532 versus 1754
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	15.659 versus 4.636
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	424.37 versus 115.549
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.67 versus 0.454
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	30.072 versus 7.024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	79.304 versus 10.485
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2189 versus 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3539 versus 1695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357 versus 2297
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2189 versus 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3539 versus 1695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357 versus 2297

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

Environ 26% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 850 MHz versus 675 MHz
2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB

Vitesse du noyau	850 MHz versus 675 MHz
Taille de mémore maximale	2 GB versus 1 GB

Comparer les références

GPU 1: AMD FirePro M4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1596

772

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

407

249

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

5532

1754

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15.659

4.636

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

424.37

115.549

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.67

0.454

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

30.072

7.024

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

79.304

10.485

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2189

1162

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3539

1695

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

2297

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2189

1162

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3539

1695

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

2297

Nom	AMD FirePro M4000	NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
PassMark - G3D Mark	1596	772
PassMark - G2D Mark	407	249
Geekbench - OpenCL	5532	1754
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	15.659	4.636
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	424.37	115.549
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.67	0.454
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	30.072	7.024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	79.304	10.485
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2189	1162
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3539	1695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357	2297
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2189	1162
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3539	1695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357	2297

Comparer les caractéristiques

	AMD FirePro M4000	NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
Essentiel
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Nom de code	Chelsea	GK107
Date de sortie	27 June 2012	1 June 2012
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	935	1409
Genre	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Prix de sortie (MSRP)		$119.90
Prix maintenant		$149.90
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)		6.18
Infos techniques
Vitesse du noyau	675 MHz	850 MHz
Performance á point flottant	691.2 gflops	326.4 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	512	192
Taux de remplissage de la texture	21.6 GTexel / s	13.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	33 Watt	45 Watt
Compte de transistor	1,500 million	1,270 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	No outputs
StereoOutput3D
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Soutien de bus	n / a
Facteur de forme	MXM-A
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	MXM-A (3.0)
Taille du laptop	medium sized	medium sized
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	None
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Vulkan
Mémoire
RAM maximale	1 GB	2 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	72 GB / s	28.8 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	128 Bit	128 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	4000 MHz	1800 MHz
Genre de mémoire	GDDR5	DDR3
Mémoire partagé	0	0