AMD FirePro M4150 vs AMD Radeon HD 6770M
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M4150 and AMD Radeon HD 6770M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M4150
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 3600 MHz
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 October 2013 vs 4 January 2011 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 3600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3348 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6770M
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 715 MHz
- Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 17.4 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
- Around 27% better floating-point performance: 696.0 gflops vs 549.1 gflops
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 964 vs 946
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 177
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8338 vs 3545
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3044 vs 2181
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3044 vs 2181
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz vs 715 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 17.4 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 480 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops vs 549.1 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 964 vs 946 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 vs 177 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8338 vs 3545 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3044 vs 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3044 vs 2181 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M4150
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6770M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro M4150 | AMD Radeon HD 6770M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 946 | 964 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 177 | 572 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3545 | 8338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1764 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1764 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2181 | 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2181 | 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3348 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.817 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 234.842 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.393 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.475 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 33.71 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro M4150 | AMD Radeon HD 6770M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Opal | Whistler |
Launch date | 16 October 2013 | 4 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1088 | 984 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 725 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 696.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 GTexel / s | 17.4 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 716 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |