AMD FirePro M4150 versus AMD Radeon R7 250
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro M4150 and AMD Radeon R7 250 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro M4150
- 3.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 1150 MHz
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 1150 MHz |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 250
- Environ 31% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 22.4 GTexel / s versus 17.16 GTexel / s
- Environ 31% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 716.8 gflops versus 549.1 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1072 versus 946
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 289 versus 177
- 2.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7733 versus 3545
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2179 versus 1764
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2179 versus 1764
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3170 versus 2181
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3170 versus 2181
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 22.4 GTexel / s versus 17.16 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 716.8 gflops versus 549.1 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1072 versus 946 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 289 versus 177 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7733 versus 3545 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2179 versus 1764 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2179 versus 1764 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 versus 2181 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 versus 2181 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3354 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M4150
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 250
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD FirePro M4150 | AMD Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 946 | 1072 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 177 | 289 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3545 | 7733 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1764 | 2179 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1764 | 2179 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2181 | 3170 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2181 | 3170 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3356 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.161 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 304.279 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.655 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.046 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 96.934 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD FirePro M4150 | AMD Radeon R7 250 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Opal | Oland |
| Date de sortie | 16 October 2013 | 8 October 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1088 | 1089 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $89 | |
| Prix maintenant | $78.34 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 27.62 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 715 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 549.1 gflops | 716.8 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.16 GTexel / s | 22.4 GTexel / s |
| Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | 1,040 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | |
| Stream Processors | 384 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Longeur | 168 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | N / A | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 64 GB / s | 72 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 / GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD FirePro M4150 avec des autres
AMDFirePro M4150 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 Ti 4200
AMDFirePro M4150 vs
AMDFirePro V5900
AMDFirePro M4150 vs
NVIDIATesla M2050
AMDFirePro M4150 vs
AMDRadeon R7 250
AMDFirePro M4150 vs
AMDRadeon R6 M340DX
AMDFirePro M4150 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M465
