AMD FirePro M4150 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M4150 and NVIDIA Quadro K2100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M4150

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
  • Around 7% higher core clock speed: 715 MHz vs 667 MHz
  • Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 3008 MHz
Launch date 16 October 2013 vs 23 July 2013
Core clock speed 715 MHz vs 667 MHz
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz vs 3008 MHz

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

  • Around 87% higher texture fill rate: 32.02 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s
  • Around 50% higher pipelines: 576 vs 384
  • Around 40% better floating-point performance: 768.4 gflops vs 549.1 gflops
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1360 vs 995
  • Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 287 vs 171
  • Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4564 vs 3745
  • Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2294 vs 1764
  • Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2294 vs 1764
  • Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3605 vs 2181
  • Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3605 vs 2181
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 32.02 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s
Pipelines 576 vs 384
Floating-point performance 768.4 gflops vs 549.1 gflops
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1360 vs 995
PassMark - G2D Mark 287 vs 171
Geekbench - OpenCL 4564 vs 3745
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2294 vs 1764
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2294 vs 1764
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3605 vs 2181
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3605 vs 2181
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3362 vs 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3362 vs 3354

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro M4150
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
995
1360
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
171
287
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
3745
4564
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1764
2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1764
2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2181
3605
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2181
3605
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3354
3362
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3354
3362
Name AMD FirePro M4150 NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
PassMark - G3D Mark 995 1360
PassMark - G2D Mark 171 287
Geekbench - OpenCL 3745 4564
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1764 2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1764 2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2181 3605
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2181 3605
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3354 3362
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3354 3362
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 12.383
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 358.892
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 21.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 40.703
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD FirePro M4150 NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Kepler
Code name Opal GK106
Launch date 16 October 2013 23 July 2013
Place in performance rating 1101 1103
Type Workstation Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $84.95
Price now $159.99
Value for money (0-100) 10.91

Technical info

Core clock speed 715 MHz 667 MHz
Floating-point performance 549.1 gflops 768.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 384 576
Texture fill rate 17.16 GTexel / s 32.02 GTexel / s
Transistor count 1,040 million 2,540 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 55 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Display Port 1.2

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
Shader Model 5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 64 GB / s 48.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz 3008 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus