AMD FirePro M6100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M6100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M6100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
• Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1075 MHz vs 811 MHz
• Around 8% better floating-point performance: 1,651 gflops vs 1,530 gflops
• 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 2000 MHz
• 6.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 52486 vs 8652
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.059 vs 29.528
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 750.731 vs 731.755
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.395 vs 2.486
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.283 vs 42.15
• Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 166.915 vs 87.659
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4537 vs 4133
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4537 vs 4133

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M

• Around 24% higher texture fill rate: 63.76 GTexel / s vs 51.6 GTexel / s
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 960 vs 768
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2791 vs 2195
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 339 vs 302
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3651 vs 1803
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3331 vs 2517
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3651 vs 1803
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3331 vs 2517

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro M6100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2195 2791
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	302 339
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	52486 8652
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	39.059 29.528
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	750.731 731.755
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.395 2.486
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	57.283 42.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	166.915 87.659
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4537 4133
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1803 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2517 3331
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4537 4133
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1803 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2517 3331

Compare specifications (specs)