AMD FirePro M6100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M6100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M6100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1075 MHz vs 811 MHz
- Around 8% better floating-point performance: 1,651 gflops vs 1,530 gflops
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- 6.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 52486 vs 8632
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.059 vs 29.528
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 750.731 vs 731.755
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.395 vs 2.486
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.283 vs 42.15
- Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 166.915 vs 87.659
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4537 vs 4133
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4537 vs 4133
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 October 2013 vs 30 May 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1075 MHz vs 811 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops vs 1,530 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 52486 vs 8632 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.059 vs 29.528 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 750.731 vs 731.755 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.395 vs 2.486 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.283 vs 42.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 166.915 vs 87.659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4537 vs 4133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4537 vs 4133 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
- Around 24% higher texture fill rate: 63.76 GTexel / s vs 51.6 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 960 vs 768
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2798 vs 2195
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 339 vs 302
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3651 vs 1803
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3331 vs 2517
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3651 vs 1803
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3331 vs 2517
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 63.76 GTexel / s vs 51.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 960 vs 768 |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2798 vs 2195 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 339 vs 302 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 vs 1803 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 vs 2517 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 vs 1803 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 vs 2517 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M6100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro M6100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2195 | 2798 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 302 | 339 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 52486 | 8632 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.059 | 29.528 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 750.731 | 731.755 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.395 | 2.486 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.283 | 42.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 166.915 | 87.659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4537 | 4133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1803 | 3651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2517 | 3331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4537 | 4133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1803 | 3651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2517 | 3331 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 964 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro M6100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Saturn | GK106 |
Launch date | 16 October 2013 | 30 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 859 | 860 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $189.99 | |
Price now | $177.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.67 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1075 MHz | 811 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops | 1,530 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 960 |
Texture fill rate | 51.6 GTexel / s | 63.76 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 2,540 million |
Boost clock speed | 797 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | large | large |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | 1 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 88 GB / s | 96.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
TXAA |