AMD FirePro M6100 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro M6100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro M6100
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 16% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1075 MHz versus 928 MHz
- Environ 16% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,651 gflops versus 1,425 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 1100x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5500 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s
- 6.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 52486 versus 7993
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.059 versus 23.168
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 750.731 versus 592.345
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.395 versus 2.141
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.283 versus 28.29
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 166.915 versus 47.404
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4537 versus 3948
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4537 versus 3948
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 16 October 2013 versus 9 October 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1075 MHz versus 928 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,651 gflops versus 1,425 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5500 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 52486 versus 7993 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.059 versus 23.168 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 750.731 versus 592.345 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.395 versus 2.141 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.283 versus 28.29 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 166.915 versus 47.404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4537 versus 3948 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4537 versus 3948 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
- Environ 15% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 59.2 billion / sec versus 51.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2525 versus 2152
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 410 versus 300
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 versus 1803
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 versus 2517
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 versus 1803
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3335 versus 2517
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 59.2 billion / sec versus 51.6 GTexel / s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2525 versus 2152 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 410 versus 300 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 versus 1803 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 versus 2517 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 versus 1803 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 versus 2517 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M6100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD FirePro M6100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2152 | 2525 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 300 | 410 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 52486 | 7993 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.059 | 23.168 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 750.731 | 592.345 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.395 | 2.141 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.283 | 28.29 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 166.915 | 47.404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4537 | 3948 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1803 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2517 | 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4537 | 3948 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1803 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2517 | 3335 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 881 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD FirePro M6100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Saturn | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 16 October 2013 | 9 October 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 873 | 874 |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Prix maintenant | $169.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 18.72 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 1075 MHz | 928 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,651 gflops | 1,425 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 768 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 51.6 GTexel / s | 59.2 billion / sec |
| Compte de transistor | 2,080 million | 2,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 105 °C | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini... |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | One 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 88 GB / s | 86.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5500 MHz | 5.4 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD FirePro M6100 avec des autres
AMDFirePro M6100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 445M
AMDFirePro M6100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560
AMDFirePro M6100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti
AMDFirePro M6100 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M380
AMDFirePro M6100 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M375X
AMDFirePro M6100 vs
AMDRadeon RX 550
