AMD FirePro M6100 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro M6100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro M6100
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 33% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1075 MHz versus 811 MHz
- Environ 8% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,651 gflops versus 1,530 gflops
- 2.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5500 MHz versus 2000 MHz
- 6.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 52486 versus 8652
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.059 versus 29.528
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 750.731 versus 731.755
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.395 versus 2.486
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.283 versus 42.15
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 166.915 versus 87.659
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4537 versus 4133
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4537 versus 4133
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 16 October 2013 versus 30 May 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1075 MHz versus 811 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,651 gflops versus 1,530 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5500 MHz versus 2000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 52486 versus 8652 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.059 versus 29.528 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 750.731 versus 731.755 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.395 versus 2.486 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.283 versus 42.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 166.915 versus 87.659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4537 versus 4133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4537 versus 4133 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
- Environ 24% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 63.76 GTexel / s versus 51.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 960 versus 768
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 3 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2791 versus 2195
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 339 versus 302
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3651 versus 1803
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3331 versus 2517
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3651 versus 1803
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3331 versus 2517
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 63.76 GTexel / s versus 51.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 960 versus 768 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 3 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2791 versus 2195 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 339 versus 302 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 versus 1803 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 versus 2517 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 versus 1803 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 versus 2517 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M6100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD FirePro M6100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2195 | 2791 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 302 | 339 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 52486 | 8652 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.059 | 29.528 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 750.731 | 731.755 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.395 | 2.486 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.283 | 42.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 166.915 | 87.659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4537 | 4133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1803 | 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2517 | 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4537 | 4133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1803 | 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2517 | 3331 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 964 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD FirePro M6100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Saturn | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 16 October 2013 | 30 May 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 860 | 861 |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $189.99 | |
| Prix maintenant | $177.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 19.67 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 1075 MHz | 811 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,651 gflops | 1,530 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 960 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 51.6 GTexel / s | 63.76 GTexel / s |
| Compte de transistor | 2,080 million | 2,540 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 797 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 960 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | large | large |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 88 GB / s | 96.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5500 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD FirePro M6100 avec des autres
AMDFirePro M6100 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6790
AMDFirePro M6100 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8790M
AMDFirePro M6100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770M
AMDFirePro M6100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 X2
AMDFirePro M6100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810A
AMDFirePro M6100 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M390
