AMD FirePro S7150 vs AMD Radeon R9 M280X
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro S7150 and AMD Radeon R9 M280X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S7150
- Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 117.6 GTexel / s vs 56 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 1792 vs 896
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 3,763 gflops vs 1,792 gflops
- 4.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3770 vs 814
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 414 vs 247
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4359 vs 3713
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4359 vs 3713
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 February 2016 vs 5 February 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 117.6 GTexel / s vs 56 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1792 vs 896 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops vs 1,792 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3770 vs 814 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 414 vs 247 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4359 vs 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4359 vs 3713 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M280X
- Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41708 vs 27103
- 5.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 583
- 5.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 583
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41708 vs 27103 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 583 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 583 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro S7150
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M280X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD FirePro S7150 | AMD Radeon R9 M280X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3770 | 814 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 414 | 247 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 27103 | 41708 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.544 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 570.969 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.687 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.637 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6147 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4359 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 583 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6147 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4359 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 583 | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD FirePro S7150 | AMD Radeon R9 M280X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | Tonga | Saturn |
| Launch date | 1 February 2016 | 5 February 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,399 | |
| Place in performance rating | 657 | 659 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | 1,792 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 896 |
| Texture fill rate | 117.6 GTexel / s | 56 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 2,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Bus support | Not Listed | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 88 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | Not Listed |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD FirePro S7150 with others
AMDFirePro S7150 vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 280 PCI
AMDFirePro S7150 vs
ATIRadeon X600 XT
AMDFirePro S7150 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 580
AMDFirePro S7150 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M280X
AMDFirePro S7150 vs
AMDFirePro W6150M
AMDFirePro S7150 vs
NVIDIAT500 Mobile
