AMD FirePro S9050 vs ATI Radeon X800 GT
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro S9050 and ATI Radeon X800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S9050
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 89% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 475 MHz
- 26.5x more texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel / s vs 3.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 110 nm
- 96x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 128 MB
- 5.6x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 986 MHz
- 58.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4901 vs 84
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 August 2014 vs 1 November 2005 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 475 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel / s vs 3.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 110 nm |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 986 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4901 vs 84 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X800 GT
- 5.6x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 423 vs 369
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 423 vs 369 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro S9050
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X800 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro S9050 | ATI Radeon X800 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4901 | 84 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 369 | 423 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 68.324 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1463.376 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.491 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.133 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 344.551 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7062 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6260 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13032 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7062 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6260 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13032 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro S9050 | ATI Radeon X800 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | R400 |
Code name | Tahiti | R430 |
Launch date | 7 August 2014 | 1 November 2005 |
Place in performance rating | 373 | 375 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 475 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel / s | 3.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 160 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 254 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 9.0b |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB / s | 31.55 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 986 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |