AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs AMD FirePro S9050
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5300M and AMD FirePro S9050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5300M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 1036 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 1261.9x more texture fill rate: 127.2 GTexel/s vs 100.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5500 MHz
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9813 vs 7062
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9813 vs 7062
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 415 vs 369
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 7 August 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1036 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 127.2 GTexel/s vs 100.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 5500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9813 vs 7062 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9813 vs 7062 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 415 vs 369 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S9050
- Around 27% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1408
- 4x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4901 vs 4847
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6260 vs 3695
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6260 vs 3695
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 13032 vs 3353
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 13032 vs 3353
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 1408 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 3 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4901 vs 4847 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6260 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6260 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13032 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13032 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5300M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S9050
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5300M | AMD FirePro S9050 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9813 | 7062 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9813 | 7062 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36495 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 415 | 369 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4847 | 4901 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 6260 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 6260 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 13032 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 13032 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 68.324 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1463.376 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.491 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.133 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 344.551 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5300M | AMD FirePro S9050 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Navi 14 | Tahiti |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 7 August 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 376 | 373 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1445 MHz | |
Compute units | 22 | |
Core clock speed | 1036 MHz | 900 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 254.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.138 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.069 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.24 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 127.2 GTexel/s | 100.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 4,313 million |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort |
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Length | 254 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 168.0 GB/s | 264 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 96 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 5500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |