NVIDIA Tesla M6 vs AMD FirePro S9050
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M6 and AMD FirePro S9050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M6
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 113.3 GTexel / s vs 100.8 GTexel / s
- Around 12% better floating-point performance: 3,625 gflops vs 3,226 gflops
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6172 vs 4901
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9390 vs 7062
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9390 vs 7062
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 August 2015 vs 7 August 2014 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 113.3 GTexel / s vs 100.8 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 3,625 gflops vs 3,226 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6172 vs 4901 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9390 vs 7062 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9390 vs 7062 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S9050
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1536
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 10% higher memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 369 vs 339
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6260 vs 3683
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6260 vs 3683
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 13032 vs 3260
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 13032 vs 3260
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 1536 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 369 vs 339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6260 vs 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6260 vs 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13032 vs 3260 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13032 vs 3260 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M6
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S9050
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla M6 | AMD FirePro S9050 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 339 | 369 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6172 | 4901 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9390 | 7062 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9390 | 7062 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 6260 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 6260 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3260 | 13032 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3260 | 13032 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 68.324 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1463.376 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.491 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.133 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 344.551 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla M6 | AMD FirePro S9050 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM204 | Tahiti |
Launch date | 30 August 2015 | 7 August 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 372 | 373 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1180 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 900 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,625 gflops | 3,226 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1792 |
Texture fill rate | 113.3 GTexel / s | 100.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 4,313 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Length | 254 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB / s | 264 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |