NVIDIA Tesla M6 vs AMD FirePro S9050

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M6 and AMD FirePro S9050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M6

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 3% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 900 MHz
  • Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 113.3 GTexel / s vs 100.8 GTexel / s
  • Around 12% better floating-point performance: 3,625 gflops vs 3,226 gflops
  • 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 225 Watt
  • Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6172 vs 4901
  • Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9390 vs 7062
  • Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9390 vs 7062
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 30 August 2015 vs 7 August 2014
Core clock speed 930 MHz vs 900 MHz
Texture fill rate 113.3 GTexel / s vs 100.8 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 3,625 gflops vs 3,226 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt vs 225 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 6172 vs 4901
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9390 vs 7062
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9390 vs 7062

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S9050

  • Around 17% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1536
  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
  • Around 10% higher memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 5012 MHz
  • Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 369 vs 339
  • Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6260 vs 3683
  • Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6260 vs 3683
  • 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 13032 vs 3260
  • 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 13032 vs 3260
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 1792 vs 1536
Maximum memory size 12 GB vs 8 GB
Memory clock speed 5500 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 369 vs 339
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 6260 vs 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 6260 vs 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 13032 vs 3260
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 13032 vs 3260

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M6
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S9050

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
339
369
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6172
4901
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9390
7062
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9390
7062
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3683
6260
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3683
6260
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3260
13032
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3260
13032
Name NVIDIA Tesla M6 AMD FirePro S9050
PassMark - G2D Mark 339 369
PassMark - G3D Mark 6172 4901
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9390 7062
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9390 7062
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3683 6260
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3683 6260
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3260 13032
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3260 13032
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 68.324
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1463.376
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.491
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 91.133
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 344.551

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Tesla M6 AMD FirePro S9050

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell 2.0 GCN 1.0
Code name GM204 Tahiti
Launch date 30 August 2015 7 August 2014
Place in performance rating 372 373
Type Workstation Workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1180 MHz
Core clock speed 930 MHz 900 MHz
Floating-point performance 3,625 gflops 3,226 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 1536 1792
Texture fill rate 113.3 GTexel / s 100.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt 225 Watt
Transistor count 5,200 million 4,313 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 8-pin
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Form factor Full Height / Full Length
Length 254 mm

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Memory bandwidth 160.4 GB / s 264 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz 5500 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5