AMD FirePro V5900 vs NVIDIA GeForce FX 5500
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro V5900 and NVIDIA GeForce FX 5500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V5900
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 230 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 140 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 64 MB
- 10x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 158x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1264 vs 8
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 350 vs 152
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 24 May 2011 vs 17 March 2004 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 230 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 140 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 64 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1264 vs 8 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 350 vs 152 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce FX 5500
- 47.9x more texture fill rate: 920 MTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
Texture fill rate | 920 MTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro V5900
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5500
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro V5900 | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5500 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1264 | 8 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 350 | 152 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2880 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.167 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 409.102 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.772 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.064 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 66.259 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2091 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5078 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2091 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5078 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro V5900 | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Rankine |
Code name | Cayman | NV34 B1 |
Launch date | 24 May 2011 | 17 March 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 1091 | 1094 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $36.99 | |
Price now | $36.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 0.30 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 230 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 614.4 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 140 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | |
Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s | 920 MTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Transistor count | 2,640 million | 45 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Length | 230 mm | 152 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 9.0a |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 1.5 (2.1) |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 64 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB / s | 3.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |