AMD FirePro V5900 vs ATI Radeon HD 5770

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro V5900 and ATI Radeon HD 5770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V5900

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 108 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 355 vs 335
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 66.259 vs 48.793
• Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5078 vs 2799
• Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5078 vs 2799

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5770

• Around 42% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 600 MHz
• Around 77% higher texture fill rate: 34.0 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
• Around 56% higher pipelines: 800 vs 512
• 2.2x better floating-point performance: 1,360.0 gflops vs 614.4 gflops
• 2.4x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 2000 MHz
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1343 vs 1265
• 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10495 vs 2880
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.373 vs 8.167
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 459.025 vs 409.102
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.906 vs 0.772
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.022 vs 20.064
• Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2636 vs 1713
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2673 vs 2091
• Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2636 vs 1713
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2673 vs 2091

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro V5900
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5770

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1265 1343
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	355 335
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2880 10495
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.167 9.373
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	409.102 459.025
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.772 0.906
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.064 27.022
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	66.259 48.793
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1713 2636
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2091 2673
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5078 2799
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1713 2636
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2091 2673
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5078 2799

Compare specifications (specs)