AMD FirePro V5900 vs ATI FirePro V4800

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro V5900 and ATI FirePro V4800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V5900

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 24% higher texture fill rate: 19.2 GTexel / s vs 15.5 GTexel / s
• Around 28% higher pipelines: 512 vs 400
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1264 vs 1204
• Around 72% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2880 vs 1670
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.167 vs 5.886
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 409.102 vs 321.782
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.772 vs 0.529
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.064 vs 14.184
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 66.259 vs 56.777
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1713 vs 1512
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5078 vs 3326
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1713 vs 1512
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5078 vs 3326

Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V4800

• Around 29% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 600 MHz
• Around 1% better floating-point performance: 620.0 gflops vs 614.4 gflops
• Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 69 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 2000 MHz
• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 456 vs 350
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2211 vs 2091
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2211 vs 2091

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro V5900
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V4800

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1264 1204
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	350 456
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2880 1670
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.167 5.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	409.102 321.782
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.772 0.529
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.064 14.184
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	66.259 56.777
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1713 1512
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2091 2211
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5078 3326
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1713 1512
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2091 2211
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5078 3326

Compare specifications (specs)