AMD Radeon R7 250 vs AMD FirePro V5900

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 250 and AMD FirePro V5900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 22.4 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
• Around 17% better floating-point performance: 716.8 gflops vs 614.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7733 vs 2880
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.161 vs 8.167
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.655 vs 0.772
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.046 vs 20.064
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 96.934 vs 66.259
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2179 vs 1713
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3170 vs 2091
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2179 vs 1713
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3170 vs 2091

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V5900

• Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
• Around 74% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1150 MHz
• Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1264 vs 1072
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 350 vs 289
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 409.102 vs 304.279
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5078 vs 3356
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5078 vs 3356

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 250
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V5900

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1072 1264
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	289 350
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	7733 2880
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.161 8.167
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	304.279 409.102
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.655 0.772
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.046 20.064
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	96.934 66.259
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2179 1713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3170 2091
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 5078
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2179 1713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3170 2091
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 5078

Compare specifications (specs)