AMD FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro V7900 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V7900
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 58.0 GTexel / s vs 26.7 billion / sec
- 3.6x more pipelines: 1280 vs 352
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 1,856.0 gflops vs 855.4 gflops
- Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 151 Watt vs 200 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.1x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27733 vs 9600
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 36.678 vs 24.513
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 171.25 vs 64.492
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3660
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 3321
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3660
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 3321
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 24 May 2011 vs 31 May 2010 |
| Texture fill rate | 58.0 GTexel / s vs 26.7 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 352 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,856.0 gflops vs 855.4 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 151 Watt vs 200 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1603 MHz (3206 data rate) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 27733 vs 9600 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.678 vs 24.513 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 171.25 vs 64.492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 3660 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 3660 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3321 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
- Around 68% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2654 vs 2254
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 465 vs 340
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 19.079 vs 14.134
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 741.303 vs 676.409
- Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.516 vs 1.309
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 725 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2654 vs 2254 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 vs 340 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.079 vs 14.134 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 741.303 vs 676.409 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.516 vs 1.309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2999 vs 2996 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2999 vs 2996 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro V7900
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD FirePro V7900 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2254 | 2654 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 340 | 465 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 27733 | 9600 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.134 | 19.079 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 676.409 | 741.303 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.309 | 2.516 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.678 | 24.513 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 171.25 | 64.492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2996 | 2999 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 3660 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2996 | 2999 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 3660 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3321 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD FirePro V7900 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Fermi |
| Code name | Cayman | GF100 |
| Launch date | 24 May 2011 | 31 May 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 825 | 827 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
| Price now | $263.28 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 12.73 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 1215 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,856.0 gflops | 855.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 352 |
| Texture fill rate | 58.0 GTexel / s | 26.7 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 151 Watt | 200 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,640 million | 3,100 million |
| Compute performance | 30x | |
| CUDA cores | 352 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 279 mm | 9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | Two 6-pins |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB / s | 102.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1603 MHz (3206 data rate) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
