NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX vs AMD FirePro V7900

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX and AMD FirePro V7900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 51% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 151 Watt
• Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2885 vs 2254
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 373 vs 340
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.251 vs 14.134
• Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.9 vs 1.309
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4175 vs 2996
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4175 vs 2996

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V7900

• Around 21% higher core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 600 MHz
• Around 21% higher texture fill rate: 58.0 GTexel / s vs 48.0 billion / sec
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 960
• Around 48% better floating-point performance: 1,856.0 gflops vs 1,256 gflops
• 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27733 vs 10654
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 676.409 vs 665.068
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 36.678 vs 36.241
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 171.25 vs 62.895
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3383
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 3334
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3383
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 3334

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V7900

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2885 2254
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	373 340
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	10654 27733
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.251 14.134
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	665.068 676.409
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.9 1.309
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	36.241 36.678
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	62.895 171.25
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4175 2996
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3383 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3334 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4175 2996
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3383 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3334 3354

Compare specifications (specs)